Murray v. Bledsoe’s Empirical Analysis
650 F.3d 246 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Pennsylvania Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3625 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Harris v. Greer · Tourscher v. McCullough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 284 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a later lowered range, instead reasoning that, because of the statutory maximum, Amendment 782 had no effect on his Guidelines range. Rivera-Cruz filed this timely appeal. II The District Court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3231 and 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and may affirm the District Court's order”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.