Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 F.3d 460 - United States v. Doyle

United States v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

650 F.3d 460 · 2011

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996)

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Franks v. Delaware · Ornelas v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [T]he magistrate or judge in issuing a warrant was misled by information in an affidavit that the affiant knew was false or would have known was false except for his reckless disregard of the truth; (2) [T]he issuing magistrate wholly abandoned his judicial role ...; (3) [T]he affidavit supporting the warrant is so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable; and (4) [Ujnder the circumstances of the case the warrant is so facially deficient, i.e., in failing to particularize the place to be searched or the things to be seized that the executing officers cannot reasonably presume it to be valid.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[EJvidence of child molestation alone does not support probable cause to search for child pornography.”). 4 . A general warrant is one that authorizes a”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “defendant had shown the victim pictures of nude children”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.