Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 F.3d 621 - United States v. Mackety

United States v. Mackety’s Empirical Analysis

650 F.3d 621 · 2011

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2242 · 18 U.S.C. § 2244

Relies on Gall v. United States · Wade v. United States · United States v. Bashara · United States v. Brooks · United States v. Townsend

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The timeliness of the defendant’s acceptance of responsibility is a consideration under both subsections, and is context specific. In general, the conduct qualifying for a decrease in offense level under subsection (b) will occur particularly early in the case. For example, to qualify under subsection (b), the defendant must have notified authorities of his intention to enter a plea of guilty at a sufficiently early point in the process so that the government may avoid preparing for trial and the court may schedule its calendar efficiently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If the defendant qualifies for a decrease under subsection (a), the offense level determined prior to the operation of subsection (a) is level 16 or greater, and upon motion of the government stating that the defendant has assisted authorities in the investigation or prosecution of his own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of his intention to enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the government to avoid preparing for trial and permitting the government and the court to allocate their resources efficiently[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This Court cannot allocate its resources efficiently if it must open court for a final pretrial conference. Therefore, if court is open for a final pretrial conference, even if a defendant pleads guilty at the time set for the final pretrial conference, the defendant will not receive the one-level reduction in offense level described in U.S.S.G. 3El.l(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.