650 F. Supp. 2d 223 - McClean v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Rosa v. Callahan · Schaal v. Apfel · Parker v. Harris · Berry v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial evidence is 'more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.' " Halloran v. Barnhart , 362 F.3d 28 , 31 (2d Cir. 2004) (quoting Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389 , 401, 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971) ). "In determining whether substantial evidence exists, a reviewing court must consider the whole record, examining the evidence from both sides, because an analysis of the substantiality of the evidence must also include that which detracts from its weight.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may set aside an ALJ's decision only where it is based upon legal error or where its factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.