Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

650 N.E.2d 1139

In re Tuel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1995

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1995-06-05

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2019

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER FINDING DISABILITY AND SUSPENDING RESPONDENT

¶2Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Seetion 25, reports to this Court its findings and recommendations.

¶3And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the findings and recommendations of the Disciplinary Commission should be adopted. Accordingly, we find that the respondent, Kenneth R. Tuel, is a disabled attorney within the meaning of Ad-mis.Disc.R. 23(25), by reason of physical or mental illness or infirmity, or because of the use or addiction to intoxicants or drugs.

¶4IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the respondent, Kenneth R. Tuel, is hereby found to be disabled by reason of such disability, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 28(25).

¶5IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in this state by reason of this Court's finding that he is disabled. The respondent may petition this Court for reinstatement upon termination of his disability, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 28(25)(F).

¶6The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order in accordance with Admis.Dise.R. 28(8)(d).

/s) Randall T. Shepard Randall T. Shepard Chief Justice of IndianaAll Justices concur.
/650/ne2d/1139 · .json · Public domain