State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
52
cited by 52 later decisions
5
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
51 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem · Thiele v. Stich · State v. Webb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[In order to] successfully challenge a conviction based upon circumstantial evidence, a defendant must point to evidence in the record that is consistent with a rational theory other than guilt. However, ‘possibilities of innocence do not require reversal of a jury verdict so long as the evidence taken as a whole makes such theories seem unreasonable.’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Stein · State v. Asfeld“failed to follow the proper procedure at step two of the Batson analysis-that is, rather than determining whether each of the prosecutor's reason was race-neutral on its face , the district court analyzed whether the reasons were credible[-,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harvey“Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain that, in view of the evidence as a whole, leads so directly to the guilt of the defendant as to exclude beyond a reasonable doubt any reasonable inference other than guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Stein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.