Dye v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Cooksey v. State · Ross v. Massachusetts · State v. Glass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as an invasion of personal privacy rather than as a common law trespass. In his concurring opinion Justice Harlan suggested a two-pronged test to identify those cases where an invasion of privacy constitutes a constitutional search: My understanding of the rule that has emerged from prior decisions is that there is a twofold requirement, first that a person have exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and, second, that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he question presented is whether under the relevant facts and circumstances Dunaway's observations constituted a search. Phrased differently, did the captain and crew of the vessel Yankee Clipper (1) have a subjective expectation of privacy in the crab stored in the ship's hold at the time of Dunaway's observations; and (2) was that expectation, if held, one which society would protect?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[B]efore a search without warrant is made a signed written statement by the person making the search shall be submitted to the person in control of the property or object to.be searched, stating the reason the search is being conducted. A written receipt shall be given by the person conducting the search for property which is taken as a result of the search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gudjonnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.