Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 P2D 888 - Ingram v. State

Ingram v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Young v. Woodson · Gilbert v. State · Smith v. State Ex Rel. Raburn · Miskovsky v. State Ex Rel. Jones · Champion v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judge before whom courtroom misconduct occurs may impose appropriate sanctions including punishment for contempt. If the judge’s conduct was so integrated with the contempt that he contributed to it or was otherwise involved or his objectivity can reasonably be questioned, the matter shall be referred to another judge. [Emphasis added].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.