In Re Jas’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Interest of M. L. P. · 272 Ga. App. 429 - In Re Ak · In the Interest of C. R. G. · In the Interest of T. B. · 275 Ga. App. 719 - In Re CM
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he same evidence supporting a finding that the deprivation is likely to continue also supports a finding that continued deprivation is likely to cause serious physical, mental, emotional, or moral harm to the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Jk“constitutes grounds for reversal only where the parent can show [s]he suffered harmi.e., how [s]he would have been successful had [s]he been represented by counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The decision as to a child's future must rest on more than positive promises which are contrary to negative past fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Dh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.