Pyne v. Black’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2018
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 399 So. 2d 1137 - Vey v. Bradford Union Guidance Clinic, Inc. · The Florida Bar v. Jameison · Cross v. State · 349 So. 2d 1187 - Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. · 39 So. 2d 554 - Yandell v. Yandell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Child support is enforceable by contempt proceedings or by a judgment for arrearages, and these remedies are not barred by the statute of limitations.”); Frazier v. Frazier, 616 So.2d 575, 579 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1993) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Pyne [the wife] testified she was afraid of Black [the husband] because he had been `abusive' to her in the past.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“has not offered a reasonable explanation for her delay in bringing this action to collect support.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.