650 So. 2d 127 - Kyle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2011
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mead v. State · Blackman v. State · 564 So. 2d 618 - Dunlop v. Dunlop · 639 So. 2d 609 - State v. Anderson · Bobb v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f [the witness] denies the conviction, the opposing party may produce the record of the conviction. In either event, the inquiry must stop at that point. The matter may not be pursued to the point of naming the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]t is error to give the instruction in a case-specific manner, as it was given here, because the instruction in effect takes from the jury the issue of the validity of the arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perry v. State“And the court further instructs you that the arrest and detention of Cecil German [a/k/a Timothy Kyle] constitutes the lawful execution of a legal duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.