Parsons v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 579 So. 2d 734 - Armstrong v. State · 645 So. 2d 1 - Tomlinson v. State · 634 So. 2d 280 - Sgroi v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any drugs or narcotics unless prescribed by a physician”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[b]e prohibited from using intoxicants to excess or possessing any drugs or narcotics unless prescribed by a physician.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[S]ince felons may not possess firearms, that portion of the condition is a valid general condition and need not be pronounced at sentencing. Thus, the first sentence of condition four is valid as a general condition of probation that need not be pronounced at sentencing and may be allowed to stand. However, since there is no similar statutory prohibition as to possession of weapons, we conclude that this prohibition is a special condition of probation that must be pronounced at sentencing in order to be valid. Accordingly, the second sentence of condition four must be stricken, and the first sentence of that condition should be allowed to stand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.