Fisel v. Wynns’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 475 So. 2d 666 - Moore v. Morris · 281 So. 2d 198 - DeJesus v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company · 354 So. 2d 54 - Vining v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. · 623 So. 2d 490 - Sunshine Vistas Homeowners Ass'n v. Caruana · 604 So. 2d 1222 - City of Pinellas Park v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Have changing conditions in Florida altered public policy as announced in Selby v. Bullock, 287 So.2d 18 (Fla.1973), so that a livestock owner may now be liable for injuries resulting when the owner's livestock wanders through an open gate, and the reason the gate is open is unknown?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“588.14 Duty of owner.No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.