Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 So. 2d 538 - White v. State

650 So. 2d 538 - White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2016

18 state decisions

70199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 423 So. 2d 348 - Sanders v. State · 378 So. 2d 1186 - Walls v. State · 527 So. 2d 777 - Thompson v. State · 513 So. 2d 91 - Jennings v. State · Wright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]estimony that may be inadmissible may be rendered harmless by prior or subsequent lawful testimony to the same effect or from which the same facts can be inferred.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “). Both the log from the Montgomery Police Department and the booking report from the Montgomery County detention facility, like the arrest warrant, showed that McNabb and Officer Gordon had had contact before the crimes. Both the log and the booking report were properly admitted into evidence. Therefore, because there was already legal evidence before the jury indicating that McNabb knew Officer Gordon, any error in the admission of the arrest warrant and its accompanying affidavit was clearly harmless. IV. McNabb contends that the trial court erred in allowing a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “); and Thompson v. State, 527 So.2d 777, 780 (Ala.Crim.App.1988) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.