Miles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 570 So. 2d 848 - Rowell v. State · 587 So. 2d 1012 - Parks v. State · Jordan v. State · Giddens v. State · Nail v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`A party who suffers an adverse ruling on a motion in limine can preserve the ruling for post-judgment and appellate review only by objecting to the introduction of the proffered evidence and assigning specific grounds at the time of trial, unless he or she obtains the express acquiescence of the trial judge that a subsequent objection and assignment of grounds are not necessary.' "Miles v. State, 650 So.2d 583 , 586 (Ala.Cr.App. 1994), quoting, Parks v. State, 587 So.2d 1012 (Ala. 1991)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“See C. Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence , § 69.01(8) (4th ed. 1991), which states:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.