Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 SO2D 612 - Emmons v. State

Emmons v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1995
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Parrish · Oliver Lee Kirkland and Elizabeth Smith v. Paul H. Preston and Luke Moore · Harris v. State · 16 Ala. App. 410 - Pool v. State · 30 Ala. App. 21 - Kelley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Thus, under Illinois law, an information can issue only after a finding of probable cause or after a defendant has waived a preliminary hearing. Because the appellant was considered a fugitive from justice, she could not possibly have waived a preliminary hearing; and there must have been a finding of probable cause before the amended information was issued. Therefore, the affidavit in this case was not necessary to support the amended information and the amended information provided sufficient support for the governor to issue the rendition warrant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.