Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

650 So. 2d 705

Grant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-03-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2003

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-03-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a ten year mandatory minimum provision on the defendant’s thirty year sentence, when he was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, not a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). Therefore, the ten year mandatory provision is reversed. The remaining arguments raised by the defendant lack merit.

¶2Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

/650/so2d/705 · .json · Public domain