Walton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1983
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cox v. State · 144 Tex. Crim. 26 - Anderson v. State · Payne v. State · Armstrong v. State · 164 Tex. Crim. 545 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The test seems to be: Would the allegations contained in the indictment be sufficient and contain all the terms and conditions of the [writing] without the additional matter? Further, notations made after the passing ... endorsements, revenue stamps and memoranda, together with monograms, etc., which constitute no part of the forgery ... need be set out in the indictment and need not be proven, yet if they do appear in the record they constitute mere surplusage and unnecessary matter which are not effective to vary the evidence from that alleged in the indictment....””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sauls v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.