Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 SW2D 250 - Jackson v. Commonwealth

Jackson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2013

5 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crafton v. State · City of Bowling Green v. Board of Education · Heady v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The holding in Boulder , when the sur-plusage is distilled, is merely that when a single prior felony is utilized to create an offense or enhance a punishment at the trial of the second crime so created or enhanced, it may not be used at that trial to prosecute the defendant under KRS 532.080. We are unwilling to further extend that holding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “KRS 527.040 — Possession of a handgun by a convicted felon. — Exceptions—(1) A person is guilty of possession of a handgun by a convicted felon when he possesses, manufactures, or transports a handgun when he has been convicted of a felony, as defined by the laws of the jurisdiction in which he was convicted, in any state or federal court and has not: (a) Been granted a full pardon by the governor or by the president of the United States; or (b) Been granted relief by the United States secretary of the treasury pursuant to the Federal Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.