Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 650 SW2D 793 - Carter v. State

Carter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2013

17 state decisions

1001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Tague v. Louisiana · Lone Star Gas Co. v. State · Eddins-Walcher Butane Company v. Calvert · Popham v. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(E) if he is 15 years of age or older at the time of the violation of a penal law of the grade of felony the juvenile court may waive its jurisdiction and he may be tried as an adult; and "(F) the statement must be signed in the presence of a magistrate by the child with no law enforcement officer or prosecuting attorney present. The magistrate must be fully convinced that the child understands the nature and contents of the statement and that the child is signing the same voluntarilj'. If such a statement is taken, the magistrate shall sign a written statement verifying the foregoing requisites have been met.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(b) * * * the statement of a child is admissible in evidence in any future proceeding concerning the matter about which the statement was given if: ****** (2) it be made orally and the child makes a statement of facts or circumstances that are found to be true, which conduct tends to establish his guilt, such as the finding of secreted or stolen property, or the instrument with which he states the offense was committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.