Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 651 A2D 319 - State v. Coreau

State v. Coreau’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
5
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2018

11 state decisions

70199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 481 - People v. Lent · State v. Hewey · State v. Whitchurch · In Re Daniel C. · 328 So. 2d 59 - State v. Credeur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]liminates the risk of future abuse while at the same time increasing the chances that the family will remain intact... .The prohibition of any contact unnecessarily punishes his children by depriving them of nonthreatening, supervised contact with their father and jeopardizes their opportunity to benefit from a stable, two-parent home environment... .Moreover, such a punitive condition does nothing to further Coreau’s rehabilitation and reintegration into society.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “During the period of probation specified in the sentence ... and upon application of a person on probation, the person’s probation officer, or upon its own motion, the court may, after a hearing upon notice to the probation officer and the person on probation, modify the requirements imposed, add further requirements authorized by section 1204, or relieve the person on probation of any requirement that, in its opinion, imposes on the person an unreasonable burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “1. [The court] shall attach such conditions of probation, as authorized by this section, as it deems to be reasonable and appropriate to assist the convicted person to lead a law-abiding life_ 2-A. As a condition of probation, the court in its sentence may require the convicted person: M. To satisfy any other conditions reasonably related to the rehabilitation of the convicted person or the public safety or security.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.