Frazier v. Manson’s Empirical Analysis
651 F.2d 1078 · 1981
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2019
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Williamson v. Tucker · Hirsch v. du Pont · 396 F. Supp. 1214 - Hirsch v. DuPont
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The District Court properly concluded that Frazier's managerial rights negated the possibility that his limited partnership interests were securities. An investor does not always need the extensive protection of the federal securities laws when he or she has partial control of an enterprise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Masel v. Villarreal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.