Jensen v. Satran’s Empirical Analysis
651 F.2d 605 · 1981
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Townsend v. Sain · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Angrist v. United States · Willis v. Ciccone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) was biased because a prison officer who sat on the disciplinary board also participated in submitting Jensen's incident report; (4) refused to disclose posted prison rules concerning inmate maintenance of assigned cells; and (5) ignored Jensen's argument that 'he had not lived in the cell in question for eight days prior to leaving the area.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jensen v. Satran“if relevant facts are in dispute and a fair evidentiary hearing was not granted in state court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Speedy v. Wyrick“the petitioner's allegations, if proven, would establish the right to his release,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Byrd v. Armontrout
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.