Bowers v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis
651 F.3d 1277 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 991 · 5 U.S.C. § 552B (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Dye v. United States Parole Commission · Byrd v. Hasty · United States v. Bowers · Luther v. Molina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall be considered actions committed to agency discretion for purposes of [ 5 U.S.C. § 701 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“commit any Federal, State, or local crime”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.