Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 651 F.3d 396 - Lux v. Judd

Lux v. Judd’s Empirical Analysis

651 F.3d 396 · 2011

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Meyer v. Grant · Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party · Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “capable of repetition, yet evading review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.