Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 651 FSUPP 1028 - Quinones v. Coler

Quinones v. Coler’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 1995
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 2020

Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Elrod v. Burns · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · O'Shea v. Littleton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a class-action situation, such a case or controversy must exist between a named class representative and defendants to permit that named plaintiff to seek relief on behalf of himself or herself and the other members of the class, O’Shea v. Littleton, 414 U.S. 488, 494 [ 94 S.Ct. 669, 675 , 38 L.Ed.2d 674 ] (1974). Because plaintiffs here are seeking injunctive relief rather than damages for prior wrongs, mere past exposure to illegal activity is not enough to create a case or controversy. Plaintiffs must show a sufficiently real and immediate threat of future harm to satisfy Article III. (Id. at 495-96), [ 94 S.Ct. at 675-76 ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.