Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 651 FSUPP 636 - United States v. Ringer

United States v. Ringer’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 2009
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. · United States v. Zylstra · United States v. Jones · 539 F. Supp. 72 - United States v. Bein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Location of Events Likely to Be In Issue. Even a cursory glance at the in dictment demonstrates that this factor calls for transfer. Despite an apparent effort on the Government’s part to insert the word “Chicago” wherever it could into the indictment, almost every fact alleged either took place in New York or was directed from there by defendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.