Gallagher v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · United States v. Marx · Lámar v. State · Lamar v. State · Hampton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule is well established that partially audible recordings may be admitted, within the discretion of the trial court, if their probative value outweighs their potential for [unfair] prejudice and if the omitted [or inaudible] portions are not so substantial as to render the recording unreliable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cheely v. State“[p]olice and prosecutors owe a duty of candor to the court [considering the issuance of the search warrant], particularly in light of the ex parte nature of these proceedings, and must not withhold information which may taint the source of the probable cause they put forth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Murdock v. State“We are inclined to agree with federal authorities stating that suppression of evidence will be justified as a result of improper execution of a warrant only if the defendant was actually prejudiced or if non-compliance was intentional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.