Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 651 SO2D 1085 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Republic of Ghana v. Trefalcon Corp. · 401 So. 2d 204 - Ferguson v. State · 401 So. 2d 191 - Nobis v. State · Knop v. McCain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The test to be applied in determining whether a juror should be removed for cause is whether the juror can eliminate the influence of his previous feelings and render a verdict according to the evidence.' Rowell v. State , 570 So.2d 848 , 855 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990). '[A] prospective juror should not be disqualified for prejudices or biases if it appears from his or her answers and demeanor that the influence of those prejudices can be eliminated and a verdict rendered according to the evidence.' Knop v. McCain , 561 So.2d 229 , 232 (Ala. 1989).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"A person commits the crime of menacing if, by physical action, he intentionally places or attempts to place another person of imminent serious physical injury."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.