651 So. 2d 1114 - Franks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc. · Keeble v. United States · Norman v. Reed · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘On remand, the issues decided by the appellate court become law of the case and the trial court’s duty is to comply with the appellate mandate “according to its true intent and meaning, as determined by the directions given by the reviewing court.” Ex parte Alabama Power Co., 431 So.2d 151 (Ala.1983) (emphasis added [in Walker ]). When the mandate is not clear, the opinion of the court should be consulted. See Cherokee Nation v. Oklahoma, 461 F.2d 674 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1039 , 93 S.Ct. 521 , 34 L.Ed.2d 489 (1972).’ “Walker v. Carolina Mills Lumber Co., 441 So.2d 980, 982 (Ala.Civ.App.1983).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"While the prosecution's privilege to withhold an informant's identity may be defeated, `the burden is on the defendant to demonstrate the need for the disclosure.' United States v. Fixen , 780 F.2d 1434 , 1439 (9th Cir. 1986), quoted in Lightfoot v. State , 531 So.2d 57 , 59 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.