Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2017
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reiter v. Cooper · Ballard v. State · Ex Parte Marek · 630 So. 2d 125 - Ex Parte Crymes · 640 So. 2d 1056 - Ex Parte Works
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To be timely, a motion for a mistrial must be made 'immediately after the question or questions are asked that are the grounds made the basis of the motion for the mistrial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. State“After reviewing the entire record, we conclude that `the jury's verdict was based on the overwhelming evidence of guilt and was not based on any prejudice'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. State“Under these circumstances, we find that [any] error in permitting the prosecutor to ask the question over defense counsel's objection was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.