Hart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

27 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “DOES THE SUPREME COURT'S PROMULGATION OF THE FORM "ORDER OF PROBATION" IN FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.986 CONSTITUTE SUFFICIENT NOTICE TO PROBATIONERS OF CONDITIONS 1-11 SUCH THAT ORAL PRONOUNCEMENT OF THESE CONDITIONS BY THE TRIAL COURT IS UNNECESSARY?”

   10 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hall v. State · Vasquez v. State

2. “(4) You will neither possess, carry, or own any weapon or firearm without first securing the consent of your Probation officer. (6) You will not use intoxicants to excess; nor will you visit places where intoxicants, drugs, or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used. (13) You shall submit to and pay for an evaluation to determine whether or not you have any treatable problem with alcohol and/or any illegal drug. If you have said problem, you are to submit to, pay for, and successfully complete any recommended treatment program as a result of said evaluation, all to be completed at the discretion of your Probation Officer.”

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hall v. State · Vasquez v. State

3. “include all those contained in the approved probation order in rule 3.986, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, it has repeatedly held that those, not contained in the statutes, are still considered”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 667 So. 2d 874 - Burdo v. State