651 So. 2d 1159 - Watson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2017
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crisp v. Rubin · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Tison v. Arizona · In re Miller · Sochor v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has been condoned as permissible trial procedure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Since the trial judge gave Watson one additional peremptory challenge, he is not entitled to reversal unless both jurors were improperly excused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.