Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

651 So. 2d 758

Sconiers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-03-06

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2005

4 state decisions

Relies on 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-03-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This cause is before us on appeal from the trial court’s order revoking Sconi-ers’ probation and sentencing him to 40 years’ imprisonment. We must vacate and remand for resentencing because this sentence exceeds the initial 10-year sentence imposed under Sconiers’ original “true split sentence.” Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988). We also direct that, on remand, the trial court enter an amended probation revocation order accurately specifying the probation violation(s) supporting the order.

¶2VACATED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

BOOTH, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
/651/so2d/758 · .json · Public domain