651 So. 2d 81 - Seay v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Rawlings v. Kentucky · Minnesota v. Dickerson · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`". . . [T]he Supreme Court correctly concluded in Rawlings v. Kentucky , [ 448 U.S. 98 , 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980),] that `where the formal arrest quickly followed on the heels of the challenged search of petitioner's person, we do not believe it particularly important that the search preceded the arrest rather than vice versa,' so long as the fruits of the search were `not necessary to support probable cause to arrest.'" "`LaFave, Search and Seizure , § 5.4(a) (2d ed. 1987).' " Green v. State , 571 So.2d 356 , 359-60 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990) (quoting, in part, Peters v. New York , 392 U.S. 40 , 41 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 , 1912 , 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968)). (Emphasis in original.) Also quoted in Callahan v. State , 644 So.2d 1329 , 1332 (Ala.Cr.App. 1994)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"`"`. . . If the prosecution shows probable cause to arrest prior to a search of a man's person, it has met its total burden. There is no case in which a defendant may validly say, "Although the officer had a right to arrest me at the moment when he seized me and searched my person, the search is invalid because he did not in fact arrest me until afterwards."'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"`A search conducted prior to the formal act of arresting is unreasonable only where "a lawful arrest could not have been made prior to the search." LaFave, Search and Seizure , § 5.4(a) (2d ed. 1987).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.