Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

651 So. 2d 814

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-03-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2006

1 state decisions

Relies on Tibero v. State · Smith v. State · Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. v. Kirk

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the judgment and sentence in this Anders appeal except for the imposition of costs of $36 for First Step and $100 for the services of the public defender.

¶2There exists no authority for assessment of costs for the benefit of First Step. Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); see also Carr v. State, 642 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

¶3The trial court failed to inform Moore of his right to contest the public defender’s fee as required by Rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The $100 fee must be stricken, but the trial court may reimpose the fee upon compliance with the rule. Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

¶4AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
/651/so2d/814 · .json · Public domain