651 So. 2d 962 - Moore v. Esponge’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. · 550 So. 2d 577 - Penalber v. Blount · Fowler v. Roberts · 646 So. 2d 318 - Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm; (2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff; (3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant; (4) the risk of harm was within the scope . of protection afforded by the duty breached.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.