Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

651 S.W.2d 319

Levingston v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · decided 1983-10-05

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1989

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

GUITTARD, Chief Justice,

¶1concurring.

¶2I cannot agree with that part of the opinion of Justice Fish holding that counsel for appellant did not make a sufficient objection to the prosecutor’s comment concerning the absence of testimony from the probation officer. Otherwise I agree with the opinion and concur in affirming the judgment.

/651/sw2d/319 · .json · Public domain