Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 A2D 560 - Monroe v. State

Monroe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
3
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Seward v. State (1999), DeJesus v. State (1995)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 47 state decisions

240199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · Greene v. Massey · Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. · Watson v. United States · Wright v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether any rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Simon v. State · Moye v. State
  2. “[t]his Court may excuse a waiver, however, if it finds that the trial court committed plain error requiring review in the interests of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. DIORIO v. State · Turner v. State
  3. “A claim of insufficiency of evidence is reviewable only if the defendant first presented it to the trial court, either in a motion for a directed verdict or a Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal. Absent any such motion, the claim is waived.”). 32 . See id. (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hardin v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.