United States v. Hansen’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.2d 1374 · 1981
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 11 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Williams (1984), United States v. Leary (1988)
41 federal appellate · 11 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Franks v. Delaware · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where the facts and circumstances known to the police are sufficient in themselves to warrant a prudent officer in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“through its assertions, concessions, and acquiescence” lost right to challenge defendant’s assertion that he possessed legitimate expectation of privacy in the searched home). Our decision on rehearing in Wilson, upon which our decision in Klima heavily relied, also pointed out that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Rhinehart“Whether a person has standing to contest a search on fourth amendment grounds turns on whether the person had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched, not merely in the items seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.