Panthers v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.2d 146 · 1980
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 23 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably CNA Financial Corp. v. Donovan (1987), Propert v. District of Columbia (1991)
44 federal appellate · 23 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Goldberg v. Kelly · Fuentes v. Shevin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Without notice of the specific reasons for denial, a claimant is reduced to guessing what evidence can or should be submitted in response and driven to responding to every possible argument against denial at the risk of missing the critical one altogether.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“"A `hearing' means any confrontation, oral or otherwise, between an affected individual [and a decisionmaker] sufficient to allow the individual to present the case in a meaningful manner. Hearings may take many forms, including a `formal,' trial-type proceeding, an `informal discuss(ion)' * * *, or a `paper hearing,' without any opportunity for oral exchange." Liese , supra, at fn. 6 , quoting Gray Panthers v. Schweiker (C.A.D.C., 1980), 652 F.2d 146 , fn. 3.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“it was because of the special coincidence of medical needs and financial problems among elderly people that the Medicare program was established in the first place.” Gray Panthers v. Schweiker, 652 F.2d 146, 166 (D.C.Cir.1980) (citing S.Rep. No. 92-1230, at 37 (1972) (group characteristics of”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.