Pike v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.2d 31 · 1981
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 38 U.S.C. § 315
Relies on Brooks v. United States · 85 Wash. 2d 52 - Grimsby v. Samson · 24 Wash. App. 92 - Roth v. Bell · Hale v. United States · 43 Wash. 2d 386 - Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“equivalent of elements taken into account in providing disability payments”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.