Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 F.2d 449 - United States v. Holder

United States v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

652 F.2d 449 · 1981

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
7
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2019

12 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Quercia v. United States · Lombard v. Marcera · United States v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n otherwise admissible declaration of one coconspirator is admissible against members of the conspiracy who joined after the statement was made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.