Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 F.2d 497 - Putnam v. Williams

Putnam v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

652 F.2d 497 · 1981

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
December 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2016

5 federal appellate ·

701981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Kirby v. American Soda Fountain Co. · Freeman v. Marine Midland Bank-New York · Sasportes v. Copacabana · The National Research Bureau, Inc. v. Forrest L. Bartholomew, in No. 72-1640. The National Research Bureau, Inc., in No. 72-1641 v. Forrest L. Bartholomew

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A joint venture relationship is characterized by a number of identifying features. In a joint venture arrangement, two or more people combine property and skill to conduct for profit a single business transaction, as opposed to a continuing business enterprise. The venturers enjoy joint proprietary interest, the right to control each other’s conduct, and the obligation to share in losses as well as profits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... the preferred practice, when no extensive proceedings on the ancillary claim have begun in federal court, is to dismiss [the state-law claim] so that the case may be brought in state court where it belongs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.