United States v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.2d 760 · 1981
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2015
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beck v. Alabama · Berra v. United States · Wenzler v. Pitchess · United States v. Iron Shell · United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister In
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a proper request is made; (2) the elements of the lesser offense are identical to part of the elements of the greater; .(3) there is spme evidence which would justify ■ conviction of the lesser offense; (4) the proof on the element or elements differentiating the two crimes is sufficiently -in dispute so that the jury may consistently find the defendant innocent of the greater and guilty of 'the lesser included offense; and (5) there is mutuality, i.e., a charge may be demanded by either the prosecution or defense. •”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“possession ... is not an element of the crime of attempting to introduce contraband into a federal correctional institution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to possess a controlled substance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.