Palmer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.2d 893 · 1981
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on Ross v. Bernhard · 20 Cal. 3d 578 - American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court · Hope v. Commissioner · Board of Trade v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission · Sergio Degioia v. United States Lines Company, and Third-Party v. American Stevedores, Inc., and Imparato Stevedoring Corp., Third-Party
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] party's acquiescence to the district court's maintenance of a bench trial, without more, is insufficient to establish a withdrawal of a jury demand.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 38(d) provides that if a proper demand for jury trial has been made, it cannot be withdrawn without the consent of all the parties, and under Rule 39(a)(1) this consent must be given by written stipulation or 'by oral stipulation made in open court and entered in the record.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“when its resolution involves the ascertainment and determination of legal rights or justifies a remedy traditionally granted by common law courts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.