Thomas v. Istar Financial, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.3d 141 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · Old Chief v. United States · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was insufficiently reprehensible to justify a punitive damages award in significant excess of [the] compensatory damages award,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may have risked harm to other employees by failing to respond to complaints of [discriminatory conduct],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“clear that [the employer]'s conduct did not result in physical injury to [the plaintiff]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.