Washington v. Hovensa LLC’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.3d 340 · 2011
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Vlandis v. Kline · Smith v. Sperling · Krasnov v. Dinan · Mitchell v. United States · Southern Cross Overseas Agencies Inc New Jersey Corporation v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd a Foreign Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between ... citizens of different States.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determines which party must first present evidence sufficient to raise a given issue as pertinent”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n individual’s domicile changes instantly if he takes up residence, at the new domicile and intends to remain there. But a domicile once acquired is presumed to continue until it is shown to have been changed. This principle ... gives rise to a presumption favoring an established domicile over a new one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.