Danos v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.3d 577 · 2011
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Louisiana Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 332 · 28 U.S.C. § 354 · 28 U.S.C. § 357 · 28 U.S.C. § 360 · 28 U.S.C. § 752
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Singleton v. Wulff · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A federal court has no subject matter jurisdiction over claims against the United States unless the government waives its sovereign immunity and consents to suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.