Boettcher v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.3d 860 · 2011
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · McCoy v. Schweiker · Guilliams v. Barnhart · Wagner v. Astrue · Pelkey v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no error when an ALJ fails to explain why an impairment does not equal one of the listed impairments as long as the overall conclusion is supported by the record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review de novo a district court's decision upholding or reversing the denial of social security benefits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.